What’s the problem with generic antiepileptic drugs?
- 17 April 2007
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Neurology
- Vol. 68 (16), 1245-1246
- https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000262876.37269.8b
Abstract
The FDA designates a generic drug as therapeutically equivalent to the reference compound (usually the brand-name drug) if it contains the same amount of active ingredient in the same dosage form and meets the same standards for strength, quality, purity, and identity.1 Two pharmacokinetic measures, the area under the drug concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax), are used to determine bioequivalence (and by extension from these surrogate measures, therapeutic equivalence). Equivalence is established when the 90% CI of the ratio of the generic to reference compound for the AUC and Cmax fall within an 80% to 125% range. The in vivo bioequivalence testing is typically done in 24 to 36 healthy adults.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Position statement on the coverage of anticonvulsant drugs for the treatment of epilepsyNeurology, 2007
- Are there potential problems with generic substitution of antiepileptic drugs?: A review of issuesSeizure, 2006
- Patient and physician reactions to generic antiepileptic substitution in the treatment of epilepsyEpilepsy & Behavior, 2005
- Therapeutic equivalency of generic antiepileptic drugs: results of a surveyEpilepsy & Behavior, 2004
- Review of Generic Bioequivalence StudiesJAMA, 1999
- Generic Drugs and the Prescribing PhysicianJAMA, 1987