Methods for Causality Assessment of Adverse Drug Reactions
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Drug Safety
- Vol. 31 (1), 21-37
- https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200831010-00003
Abstract
Numerous methods for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have been published. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of these methods and discuss their strengths and weaknesses. We conducted electronic searches in MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE and the Cochrane databases to find all assessment methods. Thirty-four different methods were found, falling into three broad categories: expert judgement/global introspection, algorithms and probabilistic methods (Bayesian approaches). Expert judgements are individual assessments based on previous knowledge and experience in the field using no standardized tool to arrive at conclusions regarding causality. Algorithms are sets of specific questions with associated scores for calculating the likelihood of a cause-effect relationship. Bayesian approaches use specific findings in a case to transform the prior estimate of probability into a posterior estimate of probability of drug causation. The prior probability is calculated from epidemiological information and the posterior probability combines this background information with the evidence in the individual case to come up with an estimate of causation. As a result of problems of reproducibility and validity, no single method is universally accepted. Different causality categories are adopted in each method, and the categories are assessed using different criteria. Because assessment methods are also not entirely devoid of individual judgements, inter-rater reliability can be low. In conclusion, there is still no method universally accepted for causality assessment of ADRs.Keywords
This publication has 74 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new method for assessing drug causation provided agreement with experts' judgmentJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Causality assessment of adverse drug reactions: comparison of the results obtained from published decisional algorithms and from the evaluations of an expert panelPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2005
- Causal or Casual?Drug Safety, 1997
- Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs—II. An original model for validation of drug causality assessment methods: Case reports with positive rechallengeJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs—I. A novel method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings: Application to drug-induced liver injuriesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Causality assessment of adverse drug reactions using decision support and informatics toolsPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 1992
- The Bayesian Differential Diagnosis of Neutropenia Associated with Antiarrhythmic AgentsThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1990
- Criteria of drug-induced liver disorders: Report of an International Consensus MeetingJournal of Hepatology, 1990
- A Bayesian Assessment of Idiosyncratic Adverse Reactions to New Drugs: Guillain-Barré Syndrome and ZimeldineThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1990
- Assessing methods for causality assessment of suspected adverse drug reactionsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989