The Adaptive Developmental State in East Asia
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of East Asian Studies
- Vol. 4 (3), 345-362
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1598240800006007
Abstract
In 1997, several of Asia's economies collapsed and the international community was called in to help mend the ailing region. The crisis attracted a great deal of attention among both the scholarly and policy communities. At that time, it seemed that the Asian miracle had come to an abrupt end. Places such as South Korea enjoyed a prosperous run though suffered a dubious demise. Later developers in Southeast Asia and China, having just emerged from out of the starting gate, quickly stalled in their attempts to ride the wave of Asia's postwar economic dynamism. Fortunately, things would not remain dour for too long. Some countries, such as Taiwan and Japan, made it through the crisis relatively unscathed. Both China and South Korea quickly rebounded. Southeast Asian countries, such as Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand, adapted and have consequently begun new growth trajectories. In the end, it seemed that the most severe and lasting casualty of the 1997 crisis was the East Asian developmental state model itself. To be sure, the more recent literatures on East Asian political economy have taken a sharp turn, wherein terms like “booty capitalism” and “crony capitalism” have quickly come to replace more laudatory titles such as the “East Asian Miracle.”Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- International Relations in the US Academy1International Studies Quarterly, 2011
- Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?Comparative Political Studies, 2007
- No Method to the Comparative Politics MadnessComparative Political Studies, 2007
- Debating the State of Comparative PoliticsComparative Political Studies, 2007
- Debating the Direction of Comparative PoliticsComparative Political Studies, 2007
- When Less is MoreInternational Sociology, 2005
- Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East AsiaPolitical Studies, 2000
- How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative PoliticsPolitical Analysis, 1990
- Comparative Politics and the Comparative MethodAmerican Political Science Review, 1971
- Concept Misformation in Comparative PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review, 1970