Probability of Cancer in Pulmonary Nodules Detected on First Screening CT
Top Cited Papers
- 5 September 2013
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 369 (10), 910-919
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1214726
Abstract
Major issues in the implementation of screening for lung cancer by means of low-dose computed tomography (CT) are the definition of a positive result and the management of lung nodules detected on the scans. We conducted a population-based prospective study to determine factors predicting the probability that lung nodules detected on the first screening low-dose CT scans are malignant or will be found to be malignant on follow-up. We analyzed data from two cohorts of participants undergoing low-dose CT screening. The development data set included participants in the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Study (PanCan). The validation data set included participants involved in chemoprevention trials at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), sponsored by the U.S. National Cancer Institute. The final outcomes of all nodules of any size that were detected on baseline low-dose CT scans were tracked. Parsimonious and fuller multivariable logistic-regression models were prepared to estimate the probability of lung cancer. In the PanCan data set, 1871 persons had 7008 nodules, of which 102 were malignant, and in the BCCA data set, 1090 persons had 5021 nodules, of which 42 were malignant. Among persons with nodules, the rates of cancer in the two data sets were 5.5% and 3.7%, respectively. Predictors of cancer in the model included older age, female sex, family history of lung cancer, emphysema, larger nodule size, location of the nodule in the upper lobe, part-solid nodule type, lower nodule count, and spiculation. Our final parsimonious and full models showed excellent discrimination and calibration, with areas under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of more than 0.90, even for nodules that were 10 mm or smaller in the validation set. Predictive tools based on patient and nodule characteristics can be used to accurately estimate the probability that lung nodules detected on baseline screening low-dose CT scans are malignant. (Funded by the Terry Fox Research Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00751660.)Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Characteristics of Lung Cancers Detected by Computer Tomography Screening in the Randomized NELSON TrialAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2013
- Decision Making in Patients with Pulmonary NodulesAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2012
- Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic ScreeningThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Lung Cancer Risk Prediction: Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Models and ValidationJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011
- NELSON lung cancer screening studyCancer Imaging, 2011
- Validation of two models to estimate the probability of malignancy in patients with solitary pulmonary nodulesThorax, 2008
- A Clinical Model To Estimate the Pretest Probability of Lung Cancer in Patients With Solitary Pulmonary NodulesSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2007
- Lung Cancer Screening Using Multi-Slice Thin-Section Computed Tomography and Autofluorescence BronchoscopyJournal of Thoracic Oncology, 2006
- CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Five-year Prospective ExperienceRadiology, 2005
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980