The efficient allocation of local public factors in Tiebout's tradition
- 30 June 1994
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Regional Science and Urban Economics
- Vol. 24 (3), 323-340
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(94)90001-9
Abstract
Tiebout's ( Journal of Political Economy , 1956, 64, 416–424) hypothesis is applied to the locational choice of firms in economies with local public inputs. A system of three source-based tax instruments is studied which, in combination with an earmarking rule, sustains production efficient allocations by decentralized decision-making. The system includes a local tax on pure profits, a local tax on land rents and a local lump-sum subsidy on the settlement of firms. The analysis is motivated by the practice in various countries of taxing profits locally at rates which can hardly be justified by service rivalry in the provision of local public factors. Applications to international economics are straightforward.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tiebout without politicsRegional Science and Urban Economics, 1991
- Competitive jurisdictions, congestion, and the Henry George Theorem: When should property be taxed instead of land?Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1991
- A Critique of Tiebout's Theory of Local Public ExpendituresEconometrica, 1981
- The Henry George Rule, Optimal Population, and Interregional EquityCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, 1980
- A Note on the Economics of Public Intermediate InputsEconomica, 1974
- Efficiency limits of fiscal mobility: An assessment of the tiebout modelJournal of Public Economics, 1972
- A Pure Theory of Local ExpendituresJournal of Political Economy, 1956