Impact of Surgical Approach on Patient-Reported Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis from a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study (The Pros-IT CNR Study)
- 7 February 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Urologia Internationalis
- Vol. 103 (1), 8-18
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000496980
Abstract
Background: To report health-related quality of life outcomes as assessed by validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: This study analyzed patients treated with RP within The PROState cancer monitoring in Italy, from the National Research Council (Pros-IT CNR). Italian versions of Short-Form Heath Survey and university of California los Angeles-prostate cancer index questionnaires were administered. PROMs were physical composite scores, mental composite scores and urinary, bowel, sexual functions and bothers (UF/B, BF/B, SF/B). Baseline unbalances were controlled with propensity scores and stabilized inverse weights; differences in PROMs between different RP approaches were estimated by mixed models. Results: Of 541 patients treated with RP, 115 (21%) received open RP (ORP), 90 (17%) laparoscopic RP (LRP) and 336 (61%) robot-assisted RP (RARP). At head-to-head comparisons, RARP showed higher 12-month UF vs. LRP (interaction treatment * time p = 0.03) and 6-month SF vs. ORP (p < 0.001). At 12-month from surgery, 67, 73 and 79% of patients used no pad for urinary loss in ORP, LRP and RARP respectively (no differences for each comparison). Conversely, 16, 27 and 40% of patients declared erections firm enough for sexual intercourse in ORP, LRP and RARP respectively (only significant difference for ORP vs. RARP, p = 0.0004). Conclusions: Different RP approaches lead to significant variations in urinary and sexual PROMs, with a general trend in favour of RARP. However, their clinical significance seems limited.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Propensity scores for confounder adjustment when assessing the effects of medical interventions using nonexperimental study designsJournal of Internal Medicine, 2014
- Benchmarks for Operative Outcomes of Robotic and Open Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the Health Professionals Follow-up StudyEuropean Urology, 2014
- When the entire population is the sample: strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiologyEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2014
- Perioperative Complications after Radical Prostatectomy: Open versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic ApproachUrologia Internationalis, 2013
- Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2012
- Pretreatment Expectations of Patients Undergoing Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic or Open Retropubic Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, 2012
- A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on MortalityMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2011
- Costs in Surgical Techniques for Radical Prostatectomy: A Review of the Current StateUrologia Internationalis, 2010
- Use of Stabilized Inverse Propensity Scores as Weights to Directly Estimate Relative Risk and Its Confidence IntervalsValue in Health, 2010
- Quality of life after radical treatment of prostate cancer: Validation of the Italian version of the University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer IndexUrology, 2005