Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 78 (3), 660S-663S
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/78.3.660s
Abstract
Worldwide, an estimated 2 billion people live primarily on a meat-based diet, while an estimated 4 billion live primarily on a plant-based diet. The US food production system uses about 50% of the total US land area, 80% of the fresh water, and 17% of the fossil energy used in the country. The heavy dependence on fossil energy suggests that the US food system, whether meat-based or plant-based, is not sustainable. The use of land and energy resources devoted to an average meat-based diet compared with a lactoovovegetarian (plant-based) diet is analyzed in this report. In both diets, the daily quantity of calories consumed are kept constant at about 3533 kcal per person. The meat-based food system requires more energy, land, and water resources than the lactoovovegetarian diet. In this limited sense, the lactoovovegetarian diet is more sustainable than the average American meat-based diet.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- World Population, Food, Natural Resources, and SurvivalWorld Futures, 2003
- Energy Inputs in Crop Production in Developing and Developed CountriesPublished by Informa UK Limited ,2002
- Ecology of Soil Erosion in EcosystemsEcosystems, 1998
- Water Resources: Agriculture, the Environment, and SocietyBioScience, 1997
- Ecosystems, sustainability, and animal agriculture.Journal of Animal Science, 1996
- Water conservation in irrigated agriculture: A stochastic production frontier modelWater Resources Research, 1992