Abstract
The green fluorescent protein (GFP) and other intrinsically fluorescent proteins (IFPs) are popular reporters because they allow visualization of cellular constituents in living specimens. IFP technology makes it possible to view dynamic processes in living cells, but extended observation, using fluorescence microscopy (both wide‐field and confocal), can result in significant light energy exposure. Therefore, it is possible that cells experience light‐induced damage that alters cell physiology and confounds observations. To understand the impact that extended viewing has on cells, we obtained quantitative information about the effect of light energy dose and observation conditions on tobacco BY‐2 cell physiology. Our results show a non‐linear relationship between the excitation light intensity and mitotic arrest, and the frequency of mitotic arrest is dependent on the presence of an IFP that absorbs the excitation light. Moreover, fluorescence microscopy induces the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), as assayed using BY‐2 cells loaded with oxidation‐sensitive dyes, and the level of ROS production increases if the cells express an IFP that absorbs the excitation light energy. The dye oxidation follows sigmoidal kinetics and is reversible if the cells are exposed to low irradiation levels. In addition, the dye oxidation rate shows a non‐linear relationship to the excitation light intensity, and a good correlation exists between photobleaching, mitotic arrest, and dye oxidation. The data highlight the importance of ROS scavenging for normal mitotic progression, and provide a reference for judiciously choosing conditions that avoid photobleaching that can lead to ROS accumulation and physiological damage.