Involuntary outpatient commitment.
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
- Vol. 9 (1-2), 94-106
- https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.9.1-2.94
Abstract
This article offers a novel approach to outpatient commitment (OPC). After distinguishing 4 varieties of OPC, the article shows how 3 are easy to justify, whereas "preventive outpatient commitment" (POC) requires more careful scrutiny. The article argues that, as a general matter, POC is not justified, except for on a "one free shot" basis. The hope is that patients will come to appreciate the benefits of treatment in the community and will become voluntarily compliant; after one free shot, they are in a much better position to decide. The consequences of noncompliance are also explored.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychiatric Advance Directives: An Alternative to Coercive Treatment?Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 2000
- The ethical challenges of a randomized controlled trial of involuntary outpatient commitmentJournal of Mental Health Administration, 1997
- Conceptualizing services research on outpatient commitmentJournal of Mental Health Administration, 1997
- Involuntary outpatient civil commitmentInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 1995
- The longing for order: Oregon's medical advance directive for mental health treatmentCommunity Mental Health Journal, 1995
- Another View of Autonomy: Arranging for Consent in AdvanceSchizophrenia Bulletin, 1991
- Outpatient civil commitment of the mentally ill: An overview and an updateBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1988
- Involuntary Outpatient Commitment of the Mentally IIISocial Work, 1988
- The promise and peril of involuntary outpatient commitment.American Psychologist, 1987
- The North Carolina experience with outpatient commitment: A critical appraisalInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 1987