Clinical accuracy of a non‐contact infrared skin thermometer in paediatric practice
- 8 June 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Child: Care, Health and Development
- Vol. 38 (4), 471-476
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01264.x
Abstract
Background Rectal thermometry is considered the most reliable method for measuring the temperature in the paediatric population. Recently, a new non‐contact skin infrared thermometer for children was introduced in the market with excellent acceptance by parents. Methods A prospective, analytical, cross‐sectional study was designed in order to assess the effectiveness of the infrared non‐contact thermometer (Thermofocus) in comparison with two other known methods used to measure body temperature. Children aged 1 to 48 months were included from the emergency room and inpatient unit. All patients selected were assessed with three different thermometers: (1) non‐contact infrared thermometer (Thermofocus); (2) temporal artery thermometer (Exergen); and (3) rectal glass mercury thermometer. Results Four hundred and thirty‐four patients were eligible to complete the study. One hundred and sixty‐seven were identified with fever. The mean age of the patients studied was 14.6 ± 10.7 months. Both devices were strongly correlated with the rectal temperature: r= 0.950 for Exergen and r= 0.952 for Thermofocus. The mean difference in temperature between the rectal temperature and the non‐contact thermometer was 0.029 ± 0.01°C (P < 0.001), while the mean difference between the temporal artery thermometer and the rectal temperature was −0.20 ± 0.27°C (P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for the non‐contact thermometer is 97%. The negative predictive value is 99%, which is especially important to rule out fever and avoid unnecessary laboratory work‐up. Conclusions The non‐contact infrared thermometer is a reliable, comfortable and accurate option for measurement of temperature and is very useful for the screening of fever in the paediatric population. More studies are recommended to support the evidence found in this study and compare its accuracy with more complex devices.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accuracy of tympanic and infrared skin thermometers in childrenArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2010
- Evaluation of Temporal Artery Thermometry in Children 3–36 Months OldJournal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 2009
- Elemental mercury exposure: An evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital managementClinical Toxicology, 2008
- Comparison between rectal and infrared skin temperature in the newbornArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 2007
- Comparison of temporal artery thermometer to standard temperature measurements in pediatric intensive care unit patientsPediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2005
- Comparison of the Temporal Artery and Rectal Thermometry in Children in the Emergency DepartmentPediatric Emergency Care, 2004
- Fever in infants and childrenCurrent Opinion in Pediatrics, 2001
- Axillary and rectal temperature measurements in infants.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1992
- Thermometers and rectal perforations in the neonate.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1978