Meta-Analysis of Genome-Wide Scans Provides Evidence for Sex- and Site-Specific Regulation of Bone Mass
Open Access
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 22 (2), 173-183
- https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.060806
Abstract
Several genome‐wide scans have been performed to detect loci that regulate BMD, but these have yielded inconsistent results, with limited replication of linkage peaks in different studies. In an effort to improve statistical power for detection of these loci, we performed a meta‐analysis of genome‐wide scans in which spine or hip BMD were studied. Evidence was gained to suggest that several chromosomal loci regulate BMD in a site‐specific and sex‐specific manner. Introduction: BMD is a heritable trait and an important predictor of osteoporotic fracture risk. Several genome‐wide scans have been performed in an attempt to detect loci that regulate BMD, but there has been limited replication of linkage peaks between studies. In an attempt to resolve these inconsistencies, we conducted a collaborative meta‐analysis of genome‐wide linkage scans in which femoral neck BMD (FN‐BMD) or lumbar spine BMD (LS‐BMD) had been studied. Materials and Methods: Data were accumulated from nine genome‐wide scans involving 11,842 subjects. Data were analyzed separately for LS‐BMD and FN‐BMD and by sex. For each study, genomic bins of 30 cM were defined and ranked according to the maximum LOD score they contained. While various densitometers were used in different studies, the ranking approach that we used means that the results are not confounded by the fact that different measurement devices were used. Significance for high average rank and heterogeneity was obtained through Monte Carlo testing. Results: For LS‐BMD, the quantitative trait locus (QTL) with greatest significance was on chromosome 1p13.3‐q23.3 (p = 0.004), but this exhibited high heterogeneity and the effect was specific for women. Other significant LS‐BMD QTLs were on chromosomes 12q24.31‐qter, 3p25.3‐p22.1, 11p12‐q13.3, and 1q32‐q42.3, including one on 18p11‐q12.3 that had not been detected by individual studies. For FN‐BMD, the strongest QTL was on chromosome 9q31.1‐q33.3 (p = 0.002). Other significant QTLs were identified on chromosomes 17p12‐q21.33, 14q13.1‐q24.1, 9q21.32‐q31.1, and 5q14.3‐q23.2. There was no correlation in average ranks of bins between men and women and the loci that regulated BMD in men and women and at different sites were largely distinct. Conclusions: This large‐scale meta‐analysis provided evidence for replication of several QTLs identified in previous studies and also identified a QTL on chromosome 18p11‐q12.3, which had not been detected by individual studies. However, despite the large sample size, none of the individual loci identified reached genome‐wide significance.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Large-Scale Evidence for the Effect of the COLIA1 Sp1 Polymorphism on Osteoporosis Outcomes: The GENOMOS StudyPLoS Medicine, 2006
- Combined Analysis from Eleven Linkage Studies of Bipolar Disorder Provides Strong Evidence of Susceptibility Loci on Chromosomes 6q and 8qAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2005
- GSMA: software implementation of the genome search meta-analysis methodBioinformatics, 2005
- HEGESMA: genome search meta-analysis and heterogeneity testingBioinformatics, 2005
- Linkage of Osteoporosis to Chromosome 20p12 and Association to BMP2PLoS Biology, 2003
- Age, gender, and body mass effects on quantitative trait loci for bone mineral density: the framingham study☆Bone, 2003
- Genome Scan Meta-Analysis of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder, Part I: Methods and Power AnalysisAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fracturesThe Lancet, 2002
- Genome Screen for Quantitative Trait Loci Underlying Normal Variation in Femoral StructureJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2001
- Replication of Linkage Studies of Complex Traits: An Examination of Variation in Location EstimatesAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1999