Agenda Constrained Legislator Ideal Points and the Spatial Voting Model
- 4 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Political Analysis
- Vol. 9 (3), 242-259
- https://doi.org/10.1093/polana/9.3.242
Abstract
Existing preference estimation procedures do not incorporate the full structure of the spatial model of voting, as they fail to use the sequential nature of the agenda. In the maximum likelihood framework, the consequences of this omission may be far-reaching. First, information useful for the identification of the model is neglected. Specifically, information that identifies the proposal locations is ignored. Second, the dimensionality of the policy space may be incorrectly estimated. Third, preference and proposal location estimates are incorrect and difficult to interpret in terms of the spatial model. We also show that the Bayesian simulation approach to ideal point estimation (Clinton et al. 2000; Jackman 2000) may be improved through the use of information about the legislative agenda. This point is illustrated by comparing several preference estimators of the first U.S. House (1789–1791).Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimation and Inference Are Missing Data Problems: Unifying Social Science Statistics via Bayesian SimulationPolitical Analysis, 2000
- Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice DataPolitical Analysis, 2000
- Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of LegislatorsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1997
- A stochastic multidimensional scaling vector threshold model for the spatial representation of “pick any/n” dataPsychometrika, 1989
- The Analysis of Committee Power: An Application to Senate Voting on the Minimum WageAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1988
- Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Exponential Response ModelsThe Annals of Statistics, 1977
- The Compromise of 1790The William and Mary Quarterly, 1970
- A French Diplomat's View of Congress, 1790The William and Mary Quarterly, 1964
- Consistency of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator in the Presence of Infinitely Many Incidental ParametersThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1956
- Estimation of a Parameter When the Number of Unknown Parameters Increases Indefinitely with the Number of ObservationsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1948