Performance of a Culturally Tailored Cognitive‐Behavioral Intervention Integrated in a Public Health Setting to Reduce Risk of Antepartum Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- 10 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
- Vol. 60 (5), 578-592
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12308
Abstract
Introduction Cognitive‐behavioral group interventions have been shown to improve depressive symptoms in adult populations. This article details the feasibility and efficacy of a 6‐week, culturally tailored, cognitive‐behavioral intervention offered to rural, minority, low‐income women at risk for antepartum depression. Methods A total of 146 pregnant women were stratified by high risk for antepartum depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [EPDS] score of 10 or higher) or by low‐moderate risk (EPDS score of 4‐9) and randomized to a cognitive‐behavioral intervention or treatment as usual. Differences in mean change of EPDS and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)‐II scores for low‐moderate and high‐risk women in the cognitive‐behavioral intervention and treatment as usual for the full sample were assessed from baseline (T1), posttreatment (T2), and one‐month follow‐up (T3), and for African American women in the subsample. Results Both the cognitive‐behavioral intervention and treatment‐as‐usual groups had significant reductions in the EPDS scores from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3. In women at high risk for depression (n = 62), there was no significant treatment effect from T1 to T2 or T3 for the EPDS. However, in low‐moderate risk women, there was a significantly greater mean change in the BDI‐II scores from significant decrease in the BDI‐II scores from T1 to T2 (4.92 vs 0.59, P = .018) and T1 to T3 (5.67 vs 1.51, P = .04). Also, the cognitive‐behavioral intervention significantly reduced EPDS scores for African American women at high risk (n = 43) from T1 to T2 (5.59 vs 2.18, P = .02) and from T1 to T3 (6.32 vs 3.14, P = .04). Discussion A cognitive‐behavioral intervention integrated within prenatal clinics is feasible in this sample, although attrition rates were high. Compared to treatment as usual, the cognitive‐behavioral intervention reduced depressive symptoms for African American women at high risk for antepartum depression and for the full sample of women at low‐moderate risk for antepartum depression. These promising findings need to be replicated in a larger controlled clinical trial that incorporates methods to maintain greater participant engagement.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Repeat testing on the Edinburgh Depression Scale and the HADS-A in pregnancy: Differentiating between transient and enduring distressJournal of Affective Disorders, 2012
- Prevalence and correlates of major depressive episode in pregnant and postpartum women in the United StatesJournal of Affective Disorders, 2011
- Homicide and Suicide During the Perinatal PeriodObstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Validity of depression rating scales during pregnancy and the postpartum period: Impact of trimester and parityJournal of Psychiatric Research, 2011
- A Meta-analysis of Depression During Pregnancy and the Risk of Preterm Birth, Low Birth Weight, and Intrauterine Growth RestrictionArchives of General Psychiatry, 2010
- The management of depression during pregnancy: a report from the American Psychiatric Association and the American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 2009
- African American Women’s Beliefs, Coping Behaviors, and Barriers to Seeking Mental Health ServicesQualitative Health Research, 2009
- Typical somatic symptoms of pregnancy and their impact on a diagnosis of major depressive disorderGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 2009
- Ten Things that Motivational Interviewing Is NotBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 2009
- Detection of Postnatal DepressionThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1987