Multilateral trade measures in a post-2012 climate change regime? What can be taken from the Montreal Protocol and the WTO?
- 31 December 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Energy Policy
- Vol. 37 (12), 5105-5112
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.020
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- How far can developing country commitments go in an immediate post-2012 climate regime?Energy Policy, 2009
- In What Format and Under What Timeframe Would China Take on Climate Commitments? A Roadmap to 2050SSRN Electronic Journal, 2009
- Asian energy and environmental policy: Promoting growth while preserving the environmentEnergy Policy, 2008
- Border tax adjustment: a feasible way to support stringent emission tradingEuropean Journal of Law and Economics, 2007
- Is action against US exports for failure to sign Kyoto Protocol WTO-legal?World Trade Review, 2007
- Domestic Climate Policies and the WTOThe World Economy, 2004
- Why did the energy intensity fall in China's industrial sector in the 1990s? The relative importance of structural change and intensity changeEnergy Economics, 2003
- Can China afford to commit itself an emissions cap? An economic and political analysisEnergy Economics, 2000
- Should the rules of allocating emissions permits be harmonised?Ecological Economics, 1999
- When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor MarketsJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1999