Clinical prediction rules in practice: review of clinical guidelines and survey of GPs
Open Access
- 31 March 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal College of General Practitioners in British Journal of General Practice
- Vol. 64 (621), e233-e242
- https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp14x677860
Abstract
Background The publication of clinical prediction rules (CPRs) studies has risen significantly. It is unclear if this reflects increasing usage of these tools in clinical practice or how this may vary across clinical areas. Aim To review clinical guidelines in selected areas and survey GPs in order to explore CPR usefulness in the opinion of experts and use at the point of care. Design and setting A review of clinical guidelines and survey of UK GPs. Method Clinical guidelines in eight clinical domains with published CPRs were reviewed for recommendations to use CPRs including primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and stroke, diabetes mellitus, fracture risk assessment in osteoporosis, lower limb fractures, breast cancer, depression, and acute infections in childhood. An online survey of 401 UK GPs was also conducted. Results Guideline review: Of 7637 records screened by title and/or abstract, 243 clinical guidelines met inclusion criteria. CPRs were most commonly recommended in guidelines regarding primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (67%) and depression (67%). There was little consensus across various clinical guidelines as to which CPR to use preferentially. Survey: Of 401 responders to the GP survey, most were aware of and applied named CPRs in the clinical areas of cardiovascular disease and depression. The commonest reasons for using CPRs were to guide management and conform to local policy requirements. Conclusion GPs use CPRs to guide management but also to comply with local policy requirements. Future research could focus on which clinical areas clinicians would most benefit from CPRs and promoting the use of robust, externally validated CPRs.Keywords
This publication has 95 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of a risk score for atrial fibrillation (Framingham Heart Study): a community-based cohort studyThe Lancet, 2009
- FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UKOsteoporosis International, 2008
- A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety DisorderArchives of Internal Medicine, 2006
- A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factorsStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- The PHQ-9Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2001
- Projecting Individualized Probabilities of Developing Breast Cancer for White Females Who Are Being Examined AnnuallyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1989
- APACHE II-A Severity of Disease Classification SystemCritical Care Medicine, 1986
- Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary reportJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1983
- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983