A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Caused by Myocardial Infarction
Top Cited Papers
- 4 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 52 (19), 1584-1588
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.065
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Left Ventricular Unloading in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Is Safe and Feasible and Provides Acute and Sustained Left Ventricular RecoveryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008
- Bridge to Life — Cardiac Mechanical SupportThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Safety and Feasibility of Elective High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures With Left Ventricular Support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5The American Journal of Cardiology, 2006
- Trends in Management and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic ShockJAMA, 2005
- Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shockEuropean Heart Journal, 2005
- Initial Experiences with the Impella Device in Patients with Cardiogenic ShockThe Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 2003
- The role of cardiac power and systemic vascular resistance in the pathophysiology and diagnosis of patients with acute congestive heart failureEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2003
- Early Revascularization in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic ShockThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1999