Immediate Versus Deferred Hormonal Treatment for Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Are Not Suitable for Curative Local Treatment: Results of the Randomized Trial SAKK 08/88
- 15 October 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 22 (20), 4109-4118
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.11.514
Abstract
Purpose To determine if immediate hormonal therapy is advantageous compared with deferred treatment in newly diagnosed asymptomatic prostate cancer patients who, for any reason, were not candidates for curative local treatment. Patients and Methods Between February 1988 and February 1992, 197 patients with a median age of 76 years (range, 56 to 86 years) were randomly assigned to receive either immediate or deferred orchiectomy on symptomatic progression. The two groups did not differ significantly in clinical or laboratory parameters; 67% had T3-4 tumors and 20% had lymph node metastases. Patient accrual was stopped prematurely because of a similar competing trial. Therefore, observation time was prolonged to achieve the desired number of events and statistical power. Results Deferred orchiectomy was necessary in 58% of the patients. Median time to disease progression was 2.8 years less than for patients with immediate orchiectomy. However, overall pain-free time from random assignment to symptomatic progression after immediate or deferred orchiectomy, and performance status, were identical in both groups. Cancer-specific survival tended to be longer in the immediate group (P = .09) but there was no difference in overall survival between the two groups (P = .96). The median hemoglobin value decreased significantly after immediate orchiectomy (P < .001). Conclusion For elderly, asymptomatic patients not undergoing curative local treatment, we were unable to show any major advantage of immediate compared with deferred hormonal treatment regarding quality of life or overall survival in our limited number of patients. Disabling complications were prevented in the deferred-treatment arm by careful follow-up; 42% of these patients never required any tumor-specific treatment.This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Studies on Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, 2002
- AN ANALYSIS OF WATCHFUL WAITING FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 1998
- The case for early endocrine treatment of advanced or metastatic prostate cancerThe Prostate, 1996
- Carcinoma of prostate: Case against immediate hormonal therapyThe Prostate, 1996
- A Class of $K$-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing RiskThe Annals of Statistics, 1988
- Hormonal therapy of prostatic carcinoma Is there a rationale for delayed treatment?Urology, 1986
- Is Delayed Treatment Justified in Carcinoma of the Prostate?BJU International, 1985
- The timing of androgen ablation therapy and/or chemotherapy in the treatment of prostatic cancerThe Prostate, 1984
- The Influence of Hormonal Therapy on Survival of Men with Advanced Prostatic CancerJournal of Urology, 1982
- Carcinoma of the Prostate: Treatment ComparisonsJournal of Urology, 1967