Tailoring explicit and implicit instruction methods to the verbal working memory capacity of students with special needs can benefit motor learning outcomes in physical education
Open Access
- 28 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Learning and Individual Differences
- Vol. 89, 102019
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102019
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Learner-Controlled Self-Observation is Advantageous for Motor Skill AcquisitionFrontiers in Psychology, 2013
- Early pathogenic care and the development of ADHD-like symptomsJournal of Neural Transmission, 2012
- Analogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomesJournal of Sports Sciences, 2009
- Learning Benefits of Self-Controlled Knowledge of Results in 10-Year-Old ChildrenResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2008
- Effect of Focus of Attention and Age on Motor Acquisition, Retention, and Transfer: A Randomized TrialPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2008
- So You Want to Learn Implicitly? Coaching and Learning through Implicit Motor Learning TechniquesInternational Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 2007
- Benefits of an external focus of attention: Common coding or conscious processing?Journal of Sports Sciences, 2006
- Analogy learning: A means to implicit motor learningJournal of Sports Sciences, 2001
- Instructions for Motor Learning: Differential Effects of Internal Versus External Focus of AttentionJournal of Motor Behavior, 1998
- Psychometric Properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a Competitive Sport Setting: A Confirmatory Factor AnalysisResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1989