Mapping the moral domain.
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Vol. 101 (2), 366-385
- https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
Abstract
The moral domain is broader than the empathy and justice concerns assessed by existing measures of moral competence, and it is not just a subset of the values assessed by value inventories. To fill the need for reliable and theoretically grounded measurement of the full range of moral concerns, we developed the Moral Foundations Questionnaire on the basis of a theoretical model of 5 universally available (but variably developed) sets of moral intuitions: Harm/Care, Fairness/Reciprocity, Ingroup/Loyalty, Authority/Respect, and Purity/Sanctity. We present evidence for the internal and external validity of the scale and the model, and in doing so we present new findings about morality: (a) Comparative model fitting of confirmatory factor analyses provides empirical justification for a 5-factor structure of moral concerns; (b) convergent/discriminant validity evidence suggests that moral concerns predict personality features and social group attitudes not previously considered morally relevant; and (c) we establish pragmatic validity of the measure in providing new knowledge and research opportunities concerning demographic and cultural differences in moral intuitions. These analyses provide evidence for the usefulness of Moral Foundations Theory in simultaneously increasing the scope and sharpening the resolution of psychological views of morality.Keywords
Funding Information
- Institute of Education Sciences
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH68447)
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgmentCognition, 2009
- MoralityPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2008
- Domain Denigration and Process Preference in Academic PsychologyPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2006
- Human fronto–mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006
- The end of the end of ideology.American Psychologist, 2006
- Altruistic punishment in humansNature, 2002
- The self-importance of moral identity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002
- Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995
- The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.Psychological Review, 1992
- Judging Social Issues: Difficulties, Inconsistencies, and ConsistenciesMonographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1991