Comparative Effectiveness of Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Upper and Lower Urinary Tract Malignancy: A Critically Appraised Topic
- 1 September 2012
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Academic Radiology
- Vol. 19 (9), 1134-1140
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.05.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to Write a Critically Appraised Topic (CAT)Academic Radiology, 2012
- Comparison of virtual cystoscopy and ultrasonography for bladder cancer detection: A meta-analysisEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2011
- How to Perform a Critically Appraised Topic: Part 1, Ask, Search, and ApplyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2011
- Comparison of CT Urography and Excretory Urography in the Detection and Localization of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary TractAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2011
- MR urography versus retrograde pyelography/ureteroscopy for the exclusion of upper urinary tract malignancyClinical Radiology, 2010
- Performance of computed tomographic urography in diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, in patients presenting with hematuria: Systematic review and meta-analysisEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2010
- AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Evidence-based Radiology: Step 1—AskSeminars in Roentgenology, 2009
- Small (<2-cm) Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Evaluation with Gadolinium-enhanced Three-dimensional Spoiled Gradient-Recalled Echo MR UrographyRadiology, 2008
- Of studies, summaries, synopses, and systems: the "4S" evolution of services for finding current best evidenceEvidence-Based Mental Health, 2001