Permissive Underfeeding or Standard Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Adults
Open Access
- 18 June 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 372 (25), 2398-2408
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1502826
Abstract
The appropriate caloric goal for critically ill adults is unclear. We evaluated the effect of restriction of nonprotein calories (permissive underfeeding), as compared with standard enteral feeding, on 90-day mortality among critically ill adults, with maintenance of the full recommended amount of protein in both groups. At seven centers, we randomly assigned 894 critically ill adults with a medical, surgical, or trauma admission category to permissive underfeeding (40 to 60% of calculated caloric requirements) or standard enteral feeding (70 to 100%) for up to 14 days while maintaining a similar protein intake in the two groups. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups; 96.8% of the patients were receiving mechanical ventilation. During the intervention period, the permissive-underfeeding group received fewer mean (±SD) calories than did the standard-feeding group (835±297 kcal per day vs. 1299±467 kcal per day, P<0.001; 46±14% vs. 71±22% of caloric requirements, P<0.001). Protein intake was similar in the two groups (57±24 g per day and 59±25 g per day, respectively; P=0.29). The 90-day mortality was similar: 121 of 445 patients (27.2%) in the permissive-underfeeding group and 127 of 440 patients (28.9%) in the standard-feeding group died (relative risk with permissive underfeeding, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.16; P=0.58). No serious adverse events were reported; there were no significant between-group differences with respect to feeding intolerance, diarrhea, infections acquired in the intensive care unit (ICU), or ICU or hospital length of stay. Enteral feeding to deliver a moderate amount of nonprotein calories to critically ill adults was not associated with lower mortality than that associated with planned delivery of a full amount of nonprotein calories. (Funded by the King Abdullah International Medical Research Center; PermiT Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN68144998.)Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Parenteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients With Short-term Relative Contraindications to Early Enteral NutritionJAMA, 2013
- Early versus Late Parenteral Nutrition in Critically Ill AdultsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Procalcitonin for reduced antibiotic exposure in the critical care setting: A systematic review and an economic evaluation*Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- Near‐Target Caloric Intake in Critically Ill Medical‐Surgical Patients Is Associated With Adverse OutcomesJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2010
- Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Executive Summary*Critical Care Medicine, 2009
- Effect of Evidence-Based Feeding Guidelines on Mortality of Critically Ill AdultsJAMA, 2008
- Prognostic impact of disease-related malnutritionClinical Nutrition, 2008
- Low caloric intake is associated with nosocomial bloodstream infections in patients in the medical intensive care unit*Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- Caloric Intake in Medical ICU PatientsSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2003
- Hypocaloric enteral tube feeding in critically ill obese patientsNutrition, 2002