Hybridity, Vacuity, and Blockage: Visions of Chaos from Anthropological Theory, Island Melanesia, and Central Africa
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- the critique-of-anthropological-reason
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Comparative Studies in Society and History
- Vol. 47 (1), 190-216
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0010417505000083
Abstract
Marshall Sahlins (1996) argues that anthropology has been the bearer of a “bourgeoisified” Judeo-Christian cosmology according to which an original state of chaos, akin to the Hobbesian state of nature, gives way to the order of society or the state. The central conundrum that this anthropology has sought to explain is how fallen and needy individuals come together in cooperative organization. Sahlins furthermore contends that, by universalizing this problematic as the key to interpreting human societies and social action, anthropology has subverted its attempts at cross-cultural understanding. My aim in this paper is to draw attention to a growing commitment within anthropology to a different cosmological paradigm with an inverse structure. Today, the elevation of ethnic and cultural hybridity as both an approximate return to primordial human unity and an emancipatory moral high ground renders socio-cultural difference at once the presumed telos of many social practices and a scandal to be overcome. Whereas the older anthropological cosmology uncovered by Sahlins posited progress from atomistic privation to social solidarity, this new cosmology posits the politically motivated splintering of essential human unity by the construction of ethnicity and culture. Although I iterate the caution that this emergent paradigm too has the potential to reproduce itself as ethnography, I emphasize as more important its promising and troubling potential to revalorize anthropological thinking on cosmology. Specifically, ownership of the meta-cosmology encoded in hybridity theory ought to prompt anthropologists to question our recently acquired aversion to the idea that cosmologies inform human action. At the same time, however, we need to scrutinize our fascination with hybridity for signs of an unintentionally Nietzschean glorification of dissolution or aestheticization of periodic destruction as the necessary foundation for political and moral renovation.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Authentic Hybrids” in the Balkan BorderlandsCurrent Anthropology, 2004
- Winners and Losers: Politics and Disorder in the Solomon Islands 2000-2002The Journal of Pacific History, 2002
- Road Mythographies: Space, Mobility, and the Historical Imagination in Postcolonial NigerAmerican Ethnologist, 2002
- The River, The Road, and The Rural-Urban Divide: A Postcolonial Moral Geography from Southeast MadagascarAmerican Ethnologist, 2002
- Groping Toward Globalization: In Search of an Anthropology Without BoundariesReviews in Anthropology, 2002
- At the Margins of Death: Ritual Space and the Politics of Location in an Indo‐Himalayan Border VillageAmerican Ethnologist, 2001
- The Sadness of Sweetness: The Native Anthropology of Western Cosmology [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 1996
- Forget Culture: Replacement, Transcendence, RelexificationCultural Anthropology, 1995
- Indigenous essentialism? ‘Simplifying’ customary land ownership in New Georgia, Solomon IslandsBijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 1993
- Of Other Spacesdiacritics, 1986