Connecting Teacher Efficacy Beliefs in Promoting Resilience to Support of Latino Students
- 23 May 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Education
- Vol. 47 (5), 876-909
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912446033
Abstract
This article explores the connection of teacher self-efficacy beliefs in promoting student resilience to teaching practice and support of Latino students. Results suggest that efficacy beliefs related to resilience are linked to building important relationships through connecting with students, building on their experiences and knowledge, and understanding the issues they confront. In particular, important to strengthening the academic resilience of Latino students are teachers’ views of their use of Spanish as an asset in their learning as well as the sensitivity teachers displayed around the added stressors Latino students face, such as discrimination and immigrant status.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- A resilience framework: perspectives for educatorsHealth Education, 2007
- The Transformative Potential of Humanizing Pedagogy: Addressing the Diverse Needs of Chicano/Mexicano StudentsThe High School Journal, 2004
- Challenging Current Notions of “Highly Qualified Teachers” through Work in a Teachers’ Inquiry GroupJournal of Teacher Education, 2003
- Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development.American Psychologist, 2001
- Effective instructional leadershipJournal of Educational Administration, 2000
- Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning and MeasureReview of Educational Research, 1998
- Dispositions Toward (Collective) Struggle and Educational Resilience in the Inner City: A Case Analysis of Six African-American High School StudentsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1997
- Teachers' Thinking About Difficult-to-Teach StudentsThe Journal of Educational Research, 1994
- Perceived Self-Efficacy in Cognitive Development and FunctioningEducational Psychologist, 1993
- Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy ConstructReview of Educational Research, 1992