Feeding ecology of the bat Eptesicus fuscus: ‘preferred’ prey abundance as one factor influencing prey selection and diet breadth
Open Access
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Zoology
- Vol. 260 (2), 169-177
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0952836903003601
Abstract
Factors influencing prey selection by insectivorous bats are poorly understood but may be related to interspecific differences in echolocation call structure. The diet of Eptesicus fuscus was compared with prey abundance across a foraging season to examine prey selection by a bat species which has an echolocation call dominated by a frequency-modulated (FM) component. Guano samples were collected on 18 occasions from a single colony between May and September 2000. Abundance of aerial insects was measured using a black-light trap on nights when guano was collected. Regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses that E. fuscus: (1) does not take prey in proportion to their relative abundance; (2) forages preferentially for beetles in a manner predicted by foraging theory. Relative abundance (= proportion in relation to other prey types) of prey in trap samples was not a good predictor of prey in the diet across periods or within periods, which suggests selective foraging. Beetles (42–96% of the diet by per cent volume) were consistently eaten in higher proportions than their relative abundance. The absolute abundance of beetles (= abundance irrespective of the abundance of other prey types) explained 60% of the variation in beetle use with more beetles eaten when they were abundant. Absolute beetle abundance explained 66%, 53% and 47% of the variation in the use of three other prey types, with more of these prey eaten when beetle abundance was low. Finally, absolute beetle abundance explained 60% of the variation in diet breadth, which increased when beetle abundance was low. Our results agree with predictions derived from foraging theory and support the hypothesis that E. fuscus forages selectively for beetles, consuming a wider variety of prey when beetle abundance is low. These results are similar to those found for the greater horseshoe bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum which has an echolocation call dominated by a constant-frequency (CF) component, and suggest that some FM bats may discriminate among prey taxa, at least at the ordinal level.This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- The relationships between echolocation calls, morphology and diet in insectivorous batsJournal of Zoology, 1999
- Prey selection by insectivorous bats: are essential fatty acids important?Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1995
- Diet, Prey Selection and Foraging Behaviour of the Orange Horseshoe-Bat, Rhinonycteris Aurantius.Wildlife Research, 1994
- Variation in Habitat Use and Prey Selection by Yuma Bats, Myotis yumanensisJournal of Mammalogy, 1992
- Prey selection in relation to insect availability by the common poorwill (Phalaenoptilus nuttallii)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1992
- Nutrition in Pregnant Big Brown Bats (Eptesicus fuscus) Feeding on June BeetlesJournal of Mammalogy, 1992
- Food Habits of Cave-Dwelling Bats in the Central AppalachiansJournal of Mammalogy, 1985
- A comparison of foraging by Eptesicus fuscus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in urban and rural environmentsCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1985
- Foraging behaviour of the giant leaf-nosed bat (Hipposideros commersoni)African Journal of Ecology, 1977
- Resource Utilization: Temporal and Spatial Components of Bat Activity in Central IowaJournal of Mammalogy, 1973