“Middle-Class” Domesticity Goes Public: Gender, Class, and Politics from Queen Caroline to Queen Victoria
- 1 October 1993
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of British Studies
- Vol. 32 (4), 396-432
- https://doi.org/10.1086/386041
Abstract
In early 1831, the novelist Edward Bulwer-Lytton contributed a comparative essay to the Edinburgh Review on “the spirit of society” in England and France. A key issue for discussion, of course, was that of fashion. “Our fashion,” stated Bulwer-Lytton, “may indeed be considered the aggregate of the opinions of our women.” The fundamental dichotomy which ran through these pages was that between public and private: “the proper sphere of woman,” Bulwer-Lytton continued, “is private life, and the proper limit to her virtues, the private affections.” And in antithesis to the aggregate opinions of “the domestic class of women”—in his view, the only virtuous kind of women—which constituted fashion, stood “public opinion”; that exclusive masculine realm, that should remain free of “feminine influence.”Some two years later, in his two-volume England and the English, Bulwer-Lytton restated the antithesis between fashion and public opinion, both repeating his earlier formulation and at the same time significantly modifying it. By 1833, his definitions of fashion and opinion ran as follows: “The middle classes interest themselves in grave matters: the aggregate of their sentiments is called OPINION. The great interest themselves in frivolities, and the aggregate of their sentiments is termed FASHION.” Here, Bulwer-Lytton no longer designated fashion as the aggregate of the opinions of women but, instead, as the aggregate of the opinions of the upper classes; and public opinion was no longer the domain of men but, instead, the aggregate of the opinions of the “middle class.”Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aristocratic Government in the Age of Reform: Whigs and Liberals, 1830- 1852.The American Historical Review, 1996
- Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707-1837Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 1995
- A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft.Eighteenth-Century Studies, 1993
- National society, communal culture: An argument about the recent historiography of eighteenth‐century Britain∗Social History, 1992
- Queen Caroline and the Sexual Politics of Popular Culture in London, 1820Representations, 1990
- Socialism, Radicalism, and Nostalgia: Social Criticism in Britain, 1775-1830The American Historical Review, 1989
- Patriarchy stabilized: The construction of the male breadwinner wage norm in nineteenth‐century Britain∗Social History, 1986
- Ladies of the Leisure Class: The Bourgeoises of Northern France in the Nineteenth CenturyThe American Historical Review, 1983
- James Mill on EducationBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 1970
- Press and People 1790-1850: Opinion in Three English Cities.The Economic History Review, 1961