Research‐active clinical nurses: against all odds

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop a theoretical understanding of factors that impact decisions of clinical nurses to conduct a research study. Background Only a small percentage of all nurses are research‐active and even fewer clinical nurses are research‐active. Several researchers have explored barriers to research activity by clinical nurses, but few have examined why, in spite of all odds, some clinical nurses are research‐active. Design As the purpose of this study was to develop a theoretical understanding of the research‐active nurse, a grounded theory approach was used. Methods The sample interviewed for this study consisted of registered nurses (n = 26) who worked in a hospital or ambulatory setting, had daily direct patient contact and had participated as principal investigator on at least one completed clinical nursing research study that was not in fulfilment of an educational requirement. The interviews were digitally recorded and analysed by two researchers using the constant comparative method. Results The findings from this study suggest that the conduct of research by clinical nurses was the direct result of a clinical trigger, characteristics and beliefs of the nurse about research and their role in generating knowledge, and the presence of support conditions, such as a research mentor. Conclusions Clinical nurses can and do conduct research, in spite of constraints due to a lack of time, money and/or knowledge, if they have access to research mentors and are practising in a research‐supportive environment. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses at the bedside are in a unique position to identify problems most in need of solutions. Findings from this study provide a foundation upon which to develop and test various programmes that seek to increase the number of clinical nurses who are research‐active.