Effectiveness of laparoscopic cadaveric dissection in enhancing resident comprehension of pelvic anatomy
- 30 April 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 192 (4), 492-497
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(01)00815-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anatomic instruction during preclinical years of medical school has been in decline recently. There is evidence that residents already lose a considerable portion of basic anatomic knowledge in the transition from student to clinician, and this deficit is even more dramatic in residents who start their training with a decreased understanding of anatomy. We questioned whether anatomy could be adequately retaught to new residents as surgical anatomy. In an effort to address this deficiency, we developed a program to teach pelvic anatomy in fresh cadavers using a laparoscopic approach. The purpose of this investigation is to determine if such a program is effective in enhancing residents’ pelvic anatomy comprehension. STUDY DESIGN: An obstetrics and gynecology residency was divided into intervention (n = 15) and control (n = 13) groups. The intervention was a 4-hour laparoscopic dissection in a fresh cadaver. Outcomes measures included a multiple-choice test, practical exam, faculty evaluation, and satisfaction assessment. The faculty evaluation and satisfaction assessment used a visual analog scale. Univarate and nonparametric analysis were used when appropriate. RESULTS: Initial test scores (p = 0.32), faculty evaluations (p = 0.25), and satisfaction scores (p = 0.17) were similar. Both groups improved their anatomic knowledge based on test scores (p = 0.004) and faculty evaluations (p < 0.001), and final test scores were not significantly different (p = 0.19). Data measured on a 10-cm visual analog scale suggested higher faculty evaluations in the intervention group (14 mm versus 10.3 mm, (p = 0.23). Similarly there were higher scores on the cadaver test in the intervention group (65% versus 50%), (p = 0.13). The intervention group was significantly more satisfied with their anatomic training (16.1 mm versus −10.1 mm, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not have sufficient power to demonstrate that a single laparoscopic cadaveric dissection improves cognitive measures of anatomic perception, but suggested that it improves spatial perception of anatomy and is perceived by residents to be a valuable educational approach.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical anatomy: A review course for emergency medicine residentsThe Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- A follow-up comparative study of two modes of learning human anatomy: By dissection and from prosectionsClinical Anatomy, 1996
- Learning human anatomy: student preferences of methods in a Nigerian medical schoolMedical Education, 1988
- Learning human anatomy: does learning occur during a lecture?Medical Education, 1988
- A course in anatomy for emergency medicine residentsThe Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1985
- Anatomy: A prometheus boundThe American Journal of Surgery, 1983
- Cadaver radiography in the teaching of gross anatomy.Radiology, 1983
- The teaching of anatomy and its influence on the art and practice of surgery.BMJ, 1980
- Medical Education: Past, Present and FutureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Advances in gross anatomy in the 20th centuryPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1977