Prognostic limitations of the Eurotransplant-donor risk index in liver transplantation
Open Access
- 24 December 2013
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
- Vol. 12 (1), 18
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-12-18
Abstract
Background Liver transplantation is the only life-saving therapeutic option for end-stage liver disease. Progressive donor organ shortage and declining donor organ quality justify the evaluation of the leverage of the Donor-Risk-Index, which was recently adjusted to the Eurotransplant community’s requirements (ET-DRI). We analysed the prognostic value of the ET-DRI for the prediction of outcome after liver transplantation in our center within the Eurotransplant community. Results 291 consecutive adult liver transplants were analysed in a single centre study with ongoing data collection. Determination of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was performed to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and overall correctness of the Eurotransplant-Donor-Risk-Index (ET-DRI) for the prediction of 3-month and 1-year mortality, as well as 3-month and 1-year graft survival. Cut-off values were determined with the best Youden-index. The ET-DRI is unable to predict 3-month mortality (AUROC: 0.477) and 3-month graft survival (AUROC: 0.524) with acceptable sensitivity, specificity and overall correctness (54% and 56.3%, respectively). Logistic regression confirmed this finding (p = 0.573 and p = 0.163, respectively). Determined cut-off values of the ET-DRI for these predictions had no significant influence on long-term patient and graft survival (p = 0.230 and p = 0.083, respectively; Kaplan-Meier analysis with Log-Rank test). Conclusions The ET-DRI should not be used for donor organ allocation policies without further evaluation, e.g. in combination with relevant recipient variables. Robust and objective prognostic scores for donor organ allocation purposes are desperately needed to balance equity and utility in donor organ allocation.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Avoid more organ transplant scandalsNature, 2013
- ‘Europe Divided Will Become More and More United’European Journal of Health Law, 2013
- D-MELD, a strong and accurate tool to guide Donor-2-Recipient MatchingAnnals of Transplantation, 2013
- http://www.D-MELD.com, the Italian survival calculator to optimize donor to recipient matching and to identify the unsustainable matches in liver transplantationTransplant International, 2012
- Variation in Organ Quality between Liver Transplant CentersAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2011
- The biopsied donor liver: Incorporating macrosteatosis into high-risk donor assessmentLiver Transplantation, 2010
- The introduction of MELD-based organ allocation impacts 3-month survival after liver transplantation by influencing pretransplant patient characteristicsTransplant International, 2009
- D-MELD, a Simple Predictor of Post Liver Transplant Mortality for Optimization of Donor/Recipient MatchingAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2009
- Optimal Utilization of Donor Grafts With Extended CriteriaAnnals of Surgery, 2006
- Estimation of time‐dependent area under the ROC curve for long‐term risk predictionStatistics in Medicine, 2005