Institutions and Policies to Protect Rural Livelihoods in REDD+ Regimes
- 1 November 2010
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in Global Environmental Politics
- Vol. 10 (4), 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00028
Abstract
While there is growing interest among researchers and practitioners concerning the risks that emerging REDD+ regimes pose to rural livelihoods, there has been little scholarly analysis of specific policies that could be applied to guard against these risks. We argue that for REDD+ regimes to avoid negative impacts on local populations, social safeguard policies will need to overcome the significant barriers posed by ambiguous property rights and weak governance and create five institutional conditions: (1) local community support for project-level activities, (2) citizen participation in reforms affecting property rights and land use, (3) transparency of forest carbon revenue flows, (4) citizen access to grievance mechanisms, and (5) opportunities for adaptive management through evaluation. We identify and discuss various policies that could be applied to produce these conditions. We argue that positively engaging rural populations in REDD+ may be integral to the effectiveness of programs in reducing deforestation and degradation, and enhancing forest carbon stores. Future research should aim to identify the causal mechanisms (policies and institutions) responsible for positive socioeconomic and ecological impacts in REDD+, while testing key theories that link participation to conservation and development outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first centuryNature Geoscience, 2010
- Sensitivity of amounts and distribution of tropical forest carbon credits depending on baseline rulesEnvironmental Science & Policy, 2009
- Biodiversity and REDD at CopenhagenCurrent Biology, 2009
- CO2 emissions from forest lossNature Geoscience, 2009
- Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commonsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- Securing land and property rights in sub-Saharan Africa: The role of local institutionsLand Use Policy, 2009
- Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefitsPhilosophical Transactions B, 2008
- The poverty of forestry policy: double standards on an uneven playing fieldSustainability Science, 2007
- What Do We Know about Natural Resources and Civil War?Journal of Peace Research, 2004