Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty
Open Access
- 13 December 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
- Vol. 22 (2), 184-189
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.001
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Austrian Science (FWF # J3353)
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the responsiveness of the SF-36, the Oxford Knee Score, and the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in patients undergoing total knee replacementQuality of Life Research, 2013
- Comparing the Lower Limb Tasks Questionnaire to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index: Agreement, Responsiveness, and Convergence With Physical Performance for Knee Osteoarthritis PatientsArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2013
- Predicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacementThe Bone & Joint Journal, 2013
- Is patient reporting of physical function accurate following total knee replacement?The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2012
- Comparison of Reliability and Responsiveness of Patient-Reported Clinical Outcome Measures in Knee Osteoarthritis RehabilitationJournal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 2012
- Do patient-reported outcome measures in hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation have robust measurement attributes? A systematic reviewJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2011
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for the KneeThe Journal of Knee Surgery, 2010
- Responsiveness of the electronic touch screen WOMAC 3.1 OA Index in a short term clinical trial with rofecoxibOsteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2004
- Knee outcome scales: Basic concepts, review of methods, cross-cultural and linguistic adaptation.2004
- Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario MacMaster Questionnaire (WOMAC) in 2205 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgiaAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 1999