Why is gout so poorly managed?
- 1 October 2007
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases
- Vol. 66 (10), 1269-1270
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.078469
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Concordance of the management of chronic gout in a UK primary-care population with the EULAR gout recommendationsAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2007
- First metatarsophalangeal joint aspiration using a 29-gauge needleAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2007
- Time required for disappearance of urate crystals from synovial fluid after successful hypouricaemic treatment relates to the duration of goutAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2007
- What factors account for referral delays for patients with suspected rheumatoid arthritis?Arthritis Care & Research, 2006
- EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: Management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee For International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT)Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2006
- EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part I: Diagnosis. Report of a task force of the standing committee for international clinical studies including therapeutics (ESCISIT)Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2006
- Suboptimal physician adherence to quality indicators for the management of gout and asymptomatic hyperuricaemia: results from the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD)Rheumatology, 2005
- Welfare rights services for people disabled with arthritis integrated in primary care and hospital settings: set-up costs and monetary benefitsRheumatology, 2004
- Quality of care indicators for gout managementArthritis & Rheumatism, 2004
- Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary goutArthritis & Rheumatism, 1977