Evaluation as Advocacy

1 February 1997

journal article
Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Practice

Vol. 18 (1), 25-35
https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409701800103

Abstract

The argument advanced in this article is that advocacy in evaluation is inevitable. This is so when advocacy is understood not as program partisanship or contaminating bias, but rather as a value commitment to a particular regulative ideal (of rational decision making, interpretive meaning, community activism). The regulative ideal for evaluation advanced in this discussion is a commitment to democratic pluralism. These ideas are illustrated and substantiated with three case examples. The question is not whether we should take sides, since we inevitably will, but rather whose side are we on? (Becker, 1967, p. 239).

Keywords

This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:

Participatory Evaluation of Development Assistance
Evaluation, 1996
Farewell to Criteriology
Qualitative Inquiry, 1996
Beyond Technique
Evaluation, 1995
Freeing Ourselves From Objectivity: Managing Subjectivity or Turning Toward a Participatory Mode of Consciousness?
Educational Researcher, 1994
Empowerment evaluation
Evaluation Practice, 1994
Better living through evaluation? Images of progress shaping evaluation practice
Evaluation Practice, 1992
Recapturing Moral Discourse in Evaluation
Educational Researcher, 1989
Doing Good or Worse: Evaluation Research Politically Re-Examined
Social Problems, 1976
Whose Side Are We On?
Social Problems, 1967

Cited by 46 articles