Sensitivity of Fit Indexes to Misspecified Structural or Measurement Model Components: Rationale of Two-Index Strategy Revisited
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Vol. 12 (3), 343-367
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1203_1
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) FindingsStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2004
- The Impact of Categorization With Confirmatory Factor AnalysisStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2002
- Fit of Different Models for Multitrait-Multimethod ExperimentsStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2002
- Book review of Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions, by David KaplanStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2002
- Book Review of A First Course in Structural Equation ModelingStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2001
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.Psychological Methods, 1998
- Sample size and bentler and Bonett's nonnormed fit indexPsychometrika, 1986
- Sample and population score matrices and sample correlation matrices from an arbitrary population correlation matrixPsychometrika, 1962