A Resect and Discard Strategy Would Improve Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening
- 31 October 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Vol. 8 (10), 865-869.e3
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2010.05.018
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975‐2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future ratesCancer, 2009
- Effect of Rising Chemotherapy Costs on the Cost Savings of Colorectal Cancer ScreeningJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2009
- Polyp Size and Advanced Histology in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Screening: Implications for CT ColonographyGastroenterology, 2008
- As tests evolve and costs of cancer care rise: reappraising stool‐based screening for colorectal neoplasiaAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2008
- Projected National Impact of Colorectal Cancer Screening on Clinical and Economic Outcomes and Health Services DemandGastroenterology, 2005
- National Polyp Study data: Evidence for regression of adenomasInternational Journal of Cancer, 2004
- Clinical Significance of Small Colorectal PolypsDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2004
- Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years.Gut, 1996
- Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polypsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1991
- Epidemiology of Polyps in the Rectum and Colon: Recovery and Evaluation of Unresected Polyps 2 Years after DetectionScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1986