A statistical comparison of pad numbers versus pad weights in the quantification of urinary incontinence
Open Access
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Neurourology and Urodynamics
- Vol. 26 (1), 3-7
- https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20352
Abstract
Aims Pad per day (PPD) usage is a frequently utilized measure of urinary incontinence. The 24‐hour pad weight test (24PWT) is a reproducible test for quantifying incontinence volumes. We investigated whether PPD validly reports the magnitude of urinary incontinence. Methods This was a retrospective review of patients undergoing stress incontinence surgery from July 2002 to 2005. Inclusion criteria were a documented 24PWT and patient‐reported PPD usage. Grams of urine loss per pad (GPP) provided a third measure of incontinence. Descriptive statistics and correlations between all variables and significance were noted. Factor analysis was performed on the three measures of leakage and age for all patients over age 50. Results One hundred forty‐five male and 116 female patients met inclusion criteria. Correlated against 24PWT, GPP has the strongest association with a correlation of 0.80 for males and 0.88 for females. PPD has a weaker correlation of 0.64 for males and 0.61 for females (R2 = 0.38 overall). Factor analysis identified two components associated with incontinence. A “leakage” component correlated best with 24PWT and GPP. Additionally, an “age” component implies that despite stable 24PWT values, older patients increase GPP while PPD decreases. Conclusions Self‐reported PPD is an unreliable measure of incontinence as this variable only measures 38% of the variation of urinary incontinence volume. Patients at a given PPD level present with a wide range of 24PWT values. Older patients have higher per‐pad leakage. Future incontinence studies should report 24PWT to ensure the most reliable and uniform data. Neurourol. Urodynam.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The repeatability of the 24-hour pad testInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2004
- Do Pad Tests and Voiding Diaries Affect Patient Willingness to Participate in Studies of Incontinence Treatment Outcomes?Journal of Urology, 2004
- The 24‐hour pad test in continent women and men: normal values and cyclical alterationsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2003
- Perineal pad test in evaluating outcome of treatments for female incontinence: a systematic review.2002
- Outcome measures for research in adult women with symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunctionActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2001
- Inadequate repeatability of the one‐hour pad test: the need for a new incontinence outcome measureBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001
- NONINVASIVE OUTCOME MEASURES OF URINARY INCONTINENCE AND LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS: A MULTICENTER STUDY OF MICTURITION DIARY AND PAD TESTSJournal of Urology, 2000
- Pad Testing in Incontinent Women: A ReviewInternational Urogynecology Journal, 1999
- Pad-weighing test performed with standardized bladder volumeUrology, 1988