A comparison of the clinical efficacy of pheniramine maleate/naphazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model
- 31 May 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier BV in Clinical Therapeutics
- Vol. 27 (5), 568-577
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.04.011
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conjunctival allergen challenge: Models in the investigation of ocular allergyCurrent Allergy and Asthma Reports, 2003
- A placebo-controlled comparison of ketotifen fumarate and nedocromil sodium ophthalmic solutions for the prevention of ocular itching with the conjunctival allergen challenge modelClinical Therapeutics, 2003
- Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challengeClinical Therapeutics, 2002
- Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled comparison of the efficacy of emedastine difumarate 0.05% ophthalmic solution and ketotifen fumarate 0.025% ophthalmic solution in the human conjunctival allergen challenge modelClinical Therapeutics, 2002
- Why are allergies increasing?Current Opinion in Immunology, 2001
- Allergic and immunologic disorders of the eye. Part II: Ocular allergyJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2000
- Why is allergy increasing? – environmental factorsClinical and Experimental Allergy, 1998
- Combined analysis of two studies using the conjunctival allergen challenge model to evaluate olopatadine hydrochloride, a new ophthalmic antiallergic agent with dual activityAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1998
- Effects of Vasocon-A in the Allergen Challenge Model of Acute Allergic ConjunctivitisAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1990
- Conjunctival Allergen ChallengeAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1990