Relative rates not relative risks: addressing a widespread misinterpretation of hazard ratios
- 6 November 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Annals of Epidemiology
- Vol. 28 (1), 54-57
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.10.014
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hazards and hazard ratiosBMJ, 2012
- Occupational and leisure time physical activity: risk of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction in the Copenhagen City Heart Study. A prospective cohort studyBMJ Open, 2012
- At odds with ratiosInternational Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 2010
- Absolute risk reductions and numbers needed to treat can be obtained from adjusted survival models for time-to-event outcomesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- The Hazards of Hazard RatiosEpidemiology, 2010
- Survival MethodsCirculation, 2008
- Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I, MHC Class I Chain-Related Molecule A, and CD8+/Regulatory T-Cell Ratio: Which Variable Determines Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients?Clinical Cancer Research, 2008
- Aspirin and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Relation to the Expression of COX-2The New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Structural accelerated failure time models for survival analysis in studies with time-varying treatmentsPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2005
- Misunderstandings about the Effects of Race and Sex on Physicians' Referrals for Cardiac CatheterizationThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1999