Accuracy of an expanded early warning score for patients in general and trauma surgery wards
Open Access
- 20 December 2011
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 99 (2), 192-197
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7777
Abstract
Background Early warning scores (EWS) may aid the prediction of major adverse events in hospitalized patients. Recently, an expanded EWS was introduced in the Netherlands. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between this EWS and the occurrence of major adverse clinical events during hospitalization of patients admitted to a general and trauma surgery ward. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients admitted to the general and trauma surgery ward of a university medical centre (March–September 2009). Follow-up was limited to the time the patient was hospitalized. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between the EWS and the occurrence of the composite endpoint consisting of death, reanimation, unexpected intensive care unit admission, emergency surgery and severe complications. Performance of the EWS was analysed using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results A total of 572 patients were included. During a median follow-up of 4 days, 46 patients (8.0 per cent) reached the composite endpoint (two deaths, two reanimations, 17 intensive care unit admissions, 44 severe complications, one emergency operation). An EWS of at least 3, adjusted for baseline American Society of Anesthesiology classification, was associated with a significantly higher risk of reaching the composite endpoint (odds ratio 11·3, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 5·5 to 22·9). The area under the ROC curve was 0·87 (95 per cent c.i. 0·81 to 0·93). When considering an EWS of at least 3 to be a positive test result, sensitivity was 74 per cent and specificity was 82 per cent. Conclusion An EWS of 3 or more is an independent predictor of major adverse events in patients admitted to a general and trauma surgery ward.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rapid response: A quality improvement conundrumJournal of Hospital Medicine, 2009
- Clinical Triggers: An Alternative to a Rapid Response TeamThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 2009
- Systematic review and evaluation of physiological track and trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the wardIntensive Care Medicine, 2007
- Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: a cluster-randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2005
- A comparison of Antecedents to Cardiac Arrests, Deaths and EMergency Intensive care Admissions in Australia and New Zealand, and the United Kingdom—the ACADEMIA studyResuscitation, 2004
- ALERT™—a multiprofessional training course in the care of the acutely ill adult patientResuscitation, 2002
- Physiological values and procedures in the 24 h before ICU admission from the wardAnaesthesia, 1999
- Can some in-hospital cardio-respiratory arrests be prevented? A prospective surveyResuscitation, 1998
- Developing strategies to prevent inhospital cardiac arrestCritical Care Medicine, 1994
- Clinical Antecedents to In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary ArrestSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 1990