Familial Identification: Population Structure and Relationship Distinguishability
Open Access
- 9 February 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Genetics
- Vol. 8 (2), e1002469
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002469
Abstract
With the expansion of offender/arrestee DNA profile databases, genetic forensic identification has become commonplace in the United States criminal justice system. Implementation of familial searching has been proposed to extend forensic identification to family members of individuals with profiles in offender/arrestee DNA databases. In familial searching, a partial genetic profile match between a database entrant and a crime scene sample is used to implicate genetic relatives of the database entrant as potential sources of the crime scene sample. In addition to concerns regarding civil liberties, familial searching poses unanswered statistical questions. In this study, we define confidence intervals on estimated likelihood ratios for familial identification. Using these confidence intervals, we consider familial searching in a structured population. We show that relatives and unrelated individuals from population samples with lower gene diversity over the loci considered are less distinguishable. We also consider cases where the most appropriate population sample for individuals considered is unknown. We find that as a less appropriate population sample, and thus allele frequency distribution, is assumed, relatives and unrelated individuals become more difficult to distinguish. In addition, we show that relationship distinguishability increases with the number of markers considered, but decreases for more distant genetic familial relationships. All of these results indicate that caution is warranted in the application of familial searching in structured populations, such as in the United States. The forensic identification of criminal suspects through DNA profiling is now common in the United States. Indirect identification by familial DNA profiling is increasingly proposed to extend the utility of DNA databases. In familial searching, a DNA profile from a crime scene partially matches a database profile entry, implicating close relatives of the partial match. While the basic principles behind familial searching methods are simple and elegant, statistical confidence that a partially matched profile belongs to a true genetic relative has not been fully explored. Here, we derive relative identification likelihood ratio statistics and consider how the ability of familial searching to distinguish relatives from unrelated individuals varies over population samples and is affected by inaccurately assumed population background. We observe lower relationship distinguishability for population samples with less identifying information in the genetic loci considered. Additionally, we show that relationship distinguishability decreases with discordance between true and assumed population samples. These results indicate that, if an inappropriate genetic population group is assumed, individuals from certain marginalized groups may be disproportionately more often subject to false familial identification. Our results suggest that care is warranted in the use and interpretation of familial searching forensic techniques.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- A method for detecting IBD regions simultaneously in multiple individuals—with applications to disease geneticsGenome Research, 2011
- A Fast, Powerful Method for Detecting Identity by DescentAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2011
- Inference of Unexpected Genetic Relatedness among Individuals in HapMap Phase IIIAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2010
- The Havasupai Indian Tribe Case — Lessons for Research Involving Stored Biologic SamplesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Explaining worldwide patterns of human genetic variation using a coalescent-based serial founder model of migration outward from AfricaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009
- SCIENCE AND SOCIETY Data sharing in genomics - re-shaping scientific practiceNature Reviews Genetics, 2009
- Global distribution of genomic diversity underscores rich complex history of continental human populationsGenome Research, 2009
- The ethics of characterizing difference: guiding principles on using racial categories in human geneticsGenome Biology, 2008
- PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage AnalysesAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2007
- Analysis of Gene Diversity in Subdivided PopulationsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1973