To Fit or Not to Fit? A Poorly Fitting Procedure Produces Inconsistent Results When the Species–Area Relationship is used to Locate Hotspots
- 16 May 2006
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Biodiversity and Conservation
- Vol. 16 (9), 2531-2538
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9029-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Habitat reduction and patterns of species lossBasic and Applied Ecology, 2004
- Self-similarity and the species – area relation of Polish butterfliesBasic and Applied Ecology, 2003
- Species–area relationships of butterflies in Europe and species richness forecastingEcography, 2003
- Geometry of the species–area relationship in central European birds: testing the mechanismJournal of Animal Ecology, 2003
- Biogeography of the tenebrionid beetles (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) on the Aegean Islands (Greece)Journal of Biogeography, 2002
- Choice of Species‐Area Function Affects Identification of HotspotsConservation Biology, 2000
- On Species-Area RelationsThe American Naturalist, 1996
- River Loads Underestimated by Rating CurvesWater Resources Research, 1986
- Intra-Archipelago Vertebrate Distributions: The Slope of the Species-Area RelationThe American Naturalist, 1981
- S = CAz, z ≃ 1/4: A Reply to Connor and McCoyThe American Naturalist, 1981