Corporate governance and risk reporting: Indian evidence
- 4 April 2017
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Managerial Auditing Journal
- Vol. 32 (4/5), 378-405
- https://doi.org/10.1108/maj-03-2016-1341
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to measure the extent of voluntary risk disclosure and examine the relationship between corporate governance firm level quality in the form of board characteristics and ownership concentration’s impact on risk disclosure in the annual reports of Indian listed companies. Design/methodology/approach The method adopted in this study is automated content analysis, which is applied to a sample of 100 listed Indian non-financial companies to find out the extent of risk disclosure. Further, multiple linear regressions have been applied to find out the relationship between corporate governance firm level quality in the form of board characteristics, ownership concentration and risk disclosure. Findings The findings reveal that the total number of positive risk keywords surpasses negative risk keywords disclosure. The corporate governance mainsprings, namely, board size and gender diversity have a positively significant effect on risk disclosure, whereas ownership concentration in the hands of the largest shareholder insignificantly affects risk disclosure, but identity of the largest shareholder having ownership concentration negatively affects disclosure of risk information in the case of Indian promoter body corporate, foreign promoter body corporate and non-institutions in comparison to family ownership. Research limitations/implications This study relied on a set of 39 risk keywords for measuring the extent of risk disclosure. Further, it uses a sample of 100 companies to examine the effect of corporate governance on risk disclosure at one point of time. However, a longitudinal study can help in understanding risk disclosure adopted by Indian listed companies in a better manner. Practical implications The findings have implications for regulatory bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Board of India, which needs to strengthen corporate governance norms with respect to board characteristics and keep a check on ownership concentration for improving risk disclosure by companies. Originality/value To best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is a preliminary attempt linking two research lines in India, that is, corporate risk disclosure and corporate governance quality in the form of board characteristics and ownership concentration. The study identifies corporate governance firm level qualities which lead to divulgation of risk information by the companies pointing towards strengthening of regulatory regime in the country for improved corporate governance regulations adopted by listed companies.Keywords
This publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- Board Composition and Financial Performance: Uncovering the Effects of Diversity in an Emerging EconomyJournal of Business Ethics, 2011
- Corporate risk disclosure by UK firms: trends and determinantsWorld Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 2009
- The Association between Board Composition and Different Types of Voluntary DisclosureEuropean Accounting Review, 2007
- Risk reporting of Japanese companies and its association with corporate characteristicsInternational Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 2007
- Measuring Risk Disclosure in IPOs and its Effect on Initial and Subsequent ReturnsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
- Examining risk reporting in UK public companiesThe Journal of Risk Finance, 2005
- Variations in ownership behavior and propensity to diversify: a study of the Indian corporate contextStrategic Management Journal, 2002
- The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control SystemsThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Separation of Ownership and ControlThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983
- The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market MechanismThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970