In‐plane visibility of lesions using breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography
- 7 October 2010
- journal article
- radiation imaging-physics
- Published by Wiley in Medical Physics
- Vol. 37 (11), 5618-5626
- https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3488899
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the visibility of simulated lesions in 2D digital mammography (DM) and breast tomosynthesis (BT) images of patients. Methods: Images of the same women were acquired on both a DM system (Mammomat Novation, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) and a BT prototype system adapted from the same type of DM system. Using the geometrical properties of the two systems, simulated lesions were projected and added to each DM image as well as to each BT projection image prior to 3D reconstruction. The same beam quality and approximately the same total absorbed dose to the glandular tissue were used for each breast image acquisition on the two systems. A series of four‐alternative forced choice human observer experiments was conducted for each of five simulated lesion diameters: 0.2, 1, 3, 8, and 25 mm. An additional experiment was conducted for the 0.2 mm lesion in BT only at twice the dose level. Threshold signal was defined as the lesion signal intensity required for a detectability index of 2.5. Four medical physicists participated in all experiments. One experiment, consisting of 60 cases, was conducted per test condition (i.e., lesion size and signal combination). Results: For the smallest lesions (0.2 mm), the threshold signal for DM was 21% lower than for BT at equivalent dose levels, and was 26% lower than DM. For the lesions larger than 1 mm, the threshold signal increased linearly (in log space) with the lesion diameter for both DM and BT, with DM requiring around twice the signal as BT. The difference in the threshold signal between BT and DM at each lesion size was statistically significant, except for the 0.2 mm lesion between and DM. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that low‐signal lesions larger than 1.0 mm may be more visible in BT compared to DM, whereas 0.2 mm lesions may be better visualized with DM compared to BT, when compared at equal dose.Keywords
Funding Information
- Cancerfonden
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Observer Performance StudyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2009
- Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesisMedical Physics, 2009
- Comparison of power spectra for tomosynthesis projections and reconstructed imagesMedical Physics, 2009
- Experimental validation of a three‐dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesisMedical Physics, 2008
- Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findingsEuropean Radiology, 2008
- Dose reduction and its influence on diagnostic accuracy and radiation risk in digital mammography: an observer performance study using an anthropomorphic breast phantomThe British Journal of Radiology, 2007
- How Do Lesion Size and Random Noise Affect Detection Performance in Digital Mammography?Academic Radiology, 2006
- A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone‐beam CT breast imagingMedical Physics, 2006
- Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer ScreeningThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Screen-Film Mammography versus Full-Field Digital Mammography with Soft-Copy Reading: Randomized Trial in a Population-based Screening Program—The Oslo II StudyRadiology, 2004