Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 100 (3), 603-617
- https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608x377117
Abstract
It is regarded as best practice for psychologists to report effect size when disseminating quantitative research findings. Reporting of effect size in the psychological literature is patchy – though ...This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical Reform in PsychologyPsychological Science, 2007
- Auditory Negative Priming in Younger and Older AdultsThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 2004
- Understanding statistical power in the context of applied researchApplied Ergonomics, 2004
- Meta-Analysis of Raw Mean Differences.Psychological Methods, 2003
- The Fifth edition of the Apa Publication Manual: Why its Statistics Recommendations are so ControversialEducational and Psychological Measurement, 2002
- Correcting the Effect Size of d for Range Restriction and UnreliabilityOrganizational Research Methods, 2001
- Given-New Versus New-Given?Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company ,2000
- The Problem of Units and the Circumstance for POMPMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1999
- Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs.Psychological Methods, 1996
- The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological researchJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973