Accounting for indirect land-use change in the life cycle assessment of biofuel supply chains
- 6 June 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by The Royal Society in Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Vol. 9 (71), 1105-1119
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0769
Abstract
The expansion of land used for crop production causes variable direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions, and other economic, social and environmental effects. We analyse the use of life cycle analysis (LCA) for estimating the carbon intensity of biofuel production from indirect land-use change (ILUC). Two approaches are critiqued: direct, attributional life cycle analysis and consequential life cycle analysis (CLCA). A proposed hybrid 'combined model' of the two approaches for ILUC analysis relies on first defining the system boundary of the resulting full LCA. Choices are then made as to the modelling methodology (economic equilibrium or cause-effect), data inputs, land area analysis, carbon stock accounting and uncertainty analysis to be included. We conclude that CLCA is applicable for estimating the historic emissions from ILUC, although improvements to the hybrid approach proposed, coupled with regular updating, are required, and uncertainly values must be adequately represented; however, the scope and the depth of the expansion of the system boundaries required for CLCA remain controversial. In addition, robust prediction, monitoring and accounting frameworks for the dynamic and highly uncertain nature of future crop yields and the effectiveness of policies to reduce deforestation and encourage afforestation remain elusive. Finally, establishing compatible and comparable accounting frameworks for ILUC between the USA, the European Union, South East Asia, Africa, Brazil and other major biofuel trading blocs is urgently needed if substantial distortions between these markets, which would reduce its application in policy outcomes, are to be avoided.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Policy Should Incorporate the Cost of Error and Uncertainty in Estimates of Fuel Carbon IntensitySSRN Electronic Journal, 2010
- Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990sProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- Securing Foreign Oil: A Case for Including Military Operations in the Climate Change Impact of FuelsEnvironment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 2010
- Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in BrazilProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- Standardized and simplified life-cycle assessment (LCA) as a driver for more sustainable biofuelsJournal of Cleaner Production, 2009
- Global environmental consequences of increased biodiesel consumption in Switzerland: consequential life cycle assessmentJournal of Cleaner Production, 2009
- Indirect land use emissions in the life cycle of biofuels: regulations vs scienceBiofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 2009
- Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels’ greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleumEnvironmental Research Letters, 2009
- Improvements in Life Cycle Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Corn‐EthanolJournal of Industrial Ecology, 2009
- Sources and sinks of carbon from land‐use change in ChinaGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles, 2003