Changing Patterns in the Management of Penetrating Abdominal Trauma: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care
- Vol. 55 (6), 1095-1110
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000101067.52018.42
Abstract
Damage control surgery (DCS) and treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome have had major impacts on care of the severely injured. The objective of this study was to see whether advances in critical care, DCS, and recognition of abdominal compartment syndrome have improved survival from penetrating abdominal injury (PAI). The care of 250 consecutive patients requiring laparotomy for PAI (1997-2000) was reviewed retrospectively. Organ injury patterns, survival, and use of DCS and its impact on outcome were compared with a similar experience reported in 1988. Two hundred fifty patients had a positive laparotomy for PAI. Twenty-seven (10.8%) required abdominal packing and 45 (17.9%) did not have fascial closure. Seven (2.8%) required emergency department thoracotomy and 21 (8.4%) required operating room thoracotomy. Two hundred seventeen (86.8%) survived overall. Small bowel (47.2%), colon (36.4%), and liver (34.4%) were most often injured. Mortality was associated with the number of organs injured (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.65-2.37; p < 0.001). Vascular injury was a risk factor for mortality (p < 0.001), as was need for DCS (p < 0.001), emergency department thoracotomy (p < 0.001), and operating room thoracotomy (p < 0.001). Seventy-nine percent of deaths occurred within 24 hours from refractory hemorrhagic shock. DCS was used in 17.9% (n = 45) versus 7.0% (n = 21) in 1988, with a higher survival rate (73.3% vs. 23.8%, p < 0.001). DCS was associated with significant morbidity including sepsis (42.4%, p < 0.001), intra-abdominal abscess (18.2%, p = 0.009), and gastrointestinal fistula (18.2%, p < 0.001). Penetrating abdominal organ injury patterns and survival from PAI have remained similar over the past decade. Death from refractory hemorrhagic shock in the first 24 hours remains the most common cause of mortality. DCS and the open abdomen are being used more frequently with improved survival but result in significant morbidity.Keywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lethal abdominal gunshot wounds at a level I trauma center: analysis of TRISS (revised trauma score and injury severity score) falloutsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 1998
- OUTCOME OF TREATMENT OF 686 GUNSHOT WOUNDS OF THE TRUNK AT LOS ANGELES COUNTY-USC MEDICAL CENTERJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 1993
- Selective Management of Anterior Abdominal Stab WoundsJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 1989
- Abdominal Gunshot WoundsAnnals of Surgery, 1988
- A Prospective Study of 651 PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 1987
- Peritoneal LavageArchives of Surgery, 1984
- The Evolution of Abdominal Stab Wound ManagementJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 1980
- SHOULD LAPAROTOMY BE MANDATOR OR SELECTIVE IN GUNSHOT WOUNDS OF THE ABDOMEN?Journal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 1977
- Gunshot Wounds of the AbdomenArchives of Surgery, 1976
- Surgical judgment in the Management of Penetrating Wounds of the AbdomenAnnals of Surgery, 1974