Selecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgery
Open Access
- 14 November 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie
- Vol. 399 (3), 263-272
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1136-8
Abstract
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in surgery are complex to design and conduct and face unique challenges compared to trials in other specialties. The appropriate selection, measurement and reporting of outcomes are one aspect that requires attention. Outcomes in surgical RCTs are often ill-defined, inconsistent and at high risk of bias in their assessment and historically, there has been an undue focus on short-term outcomes and adverse events meaning the value of trial results for clinical practice and decision-making is limited.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- CORONIS - International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: the follow-up studyBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2013
- Selective reporting of outcomes in randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of cystic fibrosisBMJ Open, 2013
- The ClinicalTrials.gov Results Database — Update and Key IssuesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendationsThe Lancet, 2009
- Challenges in evaluating surgical innovationThe Lancet, 2009
- The challenges faced in the design, conduct and analysis of surgical randomised controlled trialsTrials, 2009
- A concept for trial institutions focussing on randomised controlled trials in surgeryTrials, 2008
- Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological TreatmentsPLoS Medicine, 2007
- The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate ImprovementAnnals of Surgery, 2006