Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (Not) to Normalize
Open Access
- 6 September 2016
- journal article
- perspective
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Biology
- Vol. 14 (9), e1002542
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002542
Abstract
Citation metrics are increasingly used to appraise published research. One challenge is whether and how to normalize these metrics to account for differences across scientific fields, age (year of publication), type of document, database coverage, and other factors. We discuss the pros and cons for normalizations using different approaches. Additional challenges emerge when citation metrics need to be combined across multiple papers to appraise the corpus of scientists, institutions, journals, or countries, as well as when trying to attribute credit in multiauthored papers. Different citation metrics may offer complementary insights, but one should carefully consider the assumptions that underlie their calculation.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishingJournal of Informetrics, 2012
- Design and Update of a Classification System: The UCSD Map of SciencePLOS ONE, 2012
- Credit where credit’s due: accounting for co-authorship in citation countsScientometrics, 2011
- Significance of Authorship Position: An Open-Ended International AssessmentThe American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 2011
- Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journalsJournal of Informetrics, 2010
- How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation networkBMJ, 2009
- A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rankEMBO Reports, 2009
- Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impactProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscriptsJournal of Informetrics, 2008
- The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of KnowledgeScience, 2007