A Survey on Critical Care Resources and Practices in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
- 1 September 2014
- journal article
- Published by Ubiquity Press, Ltd. in CVD Prevention and Control
- Vol. 9 (3), 337-42.e1
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2014.08.002
Abstract
Timely and appropriate care is the key to achieving good outcomes in acutely ill patients, but the effectiveness of critical care may be limited in resource-limited settings. This study sought to understand how to implement best practices in intensive care units (ICU) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and to develop a point-of-care training and decision-support tool. An internationally representative group of clinicians performed a 22-item capacity-and-needs assessment survey in a convenience sample of 13 ICU in Eastern Europe (4), Asia (4), Latin America (3), and Africa (2), between April and July 2012. Two ICU were from low-income, 2 from low-middle-income, and 9 from upper-middle-income countries. Clinician respondents were asked about bed capacity, patient characteristics, human resources, available medications and equipment, access to education, and processes of care. Thirteen clinicians from each of 13 hospitals (1 per ICU) responded. Surveyed hospitals had median of 560 (interquartile range [IQR]: 232, 1,200) beds. ICU had a median of 9 (IQR: 7, 12) beds and treated 40 (IQR: 20, 67) patients per month. Many ICU had ≥ 1 staff member with some formal critical care training (n = 9, 69%) or who completed Fundamental Critical Care Support (n = 7, 54%) or Advanced Cardiac Life Support (n = 9, 69%) courses. Only 2 ICU (15%) used any kind of checklists for acute resuscitation. Ten (77%) ICU listed lack of trained staff as the most important barrier to improving the care and outcomes of critically ill patients. In a convenience sample of 13 ICU from LMIC, specialty-trained staff and standardized processes of care such as checklists are frequently lacking. ICU needs-assessment evaluations should be expanded in LMIC as a global priority, with the goal of creating and evaluating context-appropriate checklists for ICU best practices.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global Health Care of the Critically Ill in Low-Resource SettingsAnnals of the American Thoracic Society, 2013
- Critical care - where have we been and where are we going?Critical Care, 2013
- Year in review 2011: Critical Care - Resource ManagementCritical Care, 2012
- Thirty-Day Outcomes Support Implementation of a Surgical Safety ChecklistJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2012
- Prompting Physicians to Address a Daily Checklist and Process of Care and Clinical OutcomesAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- Management of severe sepsis in patients admitted to Asian intensive care units: prospective cohort studyBMJ, 2011
- Availability of critical care resources to treat patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in Africa: a self-reported, continent-wide survey of anaesthesia providersCritical Care, 2011
- The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis*Critical Care Medicine, 2010
- Critical care in the developing world - a challenge for us allCritical Care, 2010
- Critical care in low‐income countriesTropical Medicine & International Health, 2009