Invited Commentary: Understanding Bias Amplification
Open Access
- 27 October 2011
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 174 (11), 1223-1227
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr352
Abstract
In choosing covariates for adjustment or inclusion in propensity score analysis, researchers must weigh the benefit of reducing confounding bias carried by those covariates against the risk of amplifying residual bias carried by unmeasured confounders. The latter is characteristic of covariates that act like instrumental variables—that is, variables that are more strongly associated with the exposure than with the outcome. In this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(11):1213–1222), Myers et al. compare the bias amplification of a near-instrumental variable with its bias-reducing potential and suggest that, in practice, the latter outweighs the former. The author of this commentary sheds broader light on this comparison by considering the cumulative effects of conditioning on multiple covariates and showing that bias amplification may build up at a faster rate than bias reduction. The author further derives a partial order on sets of covariates which reveals preference for conditioning on outcome-related, rather than exposure-related, confounders.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Adjusting for Instrumental Variables on Bias and Precision of Effect EstimatesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- The implications of propensity score variable selection strategies in pharmacoepidemiology: an empirical illustrationPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2011
- Should observational studies be designed to allow lack of balance in covariate distributions across treatment groups?Statistics in Medicine, 2009
- Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: Comments on ‘A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003’ by Peter Austin,Statistics in MedicineStatistics in Medicine, 2008
- A critical appraisal of propensity‐score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003Statistics in Medicine, 2007
- Functional Restriction and Efficiency in Causal InferenceThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004
- Estimation of Causal Effects using Propensity Score Weighting: An Application to Data on Right Heart CatheterizationHealth Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2001
- The relative efficiencies of matched and independent sample designs for case-control studiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1983
- OVERADJUSTMENT IN CASE-CONTROL STUDIESAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1980