Effect of respiration on nasopharyngeal radiographs when assessing adenoidal enlargement
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
- Vol. 103 (1), 71-73
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100108060
Abstract
Clinical assessment of adenoidal enlargement in children is difficult and so the lateral nasopharyngeal radiograph is frequently used to assess both adenoid size and the appearance of the adjacent airways. Various measurements of the soft tissues and airways can be made to assess normality or otherwise. Little previously has been mentioned about the physiological conditions, particularly the mode of respiration, under which these radiographs should be obtained and how changes in these conditions affect their appearance. The marked effect in the appearances of nasopharyngeal soft tissues and palatal airway on simply changing from mouth to nose breathing is presented, and an alternative method of examination, for use under certain circumstances is described.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The evaluation of radiographs of the nasopharynxClinical Otolaryngology, 1985
- Inter-observer variability in the clinical and radiological assessment of adenoid size, and the correlation with adenoid volumeClinical Otolaryngology, 1981
- How should adenoidal enlargement be measured? A radiological study based on interobserver agreementClinical Radiology, 1981
- Assessment of the Nasopharyngeal Airway: A Rhinomanometric and Radiographic Study in Children with AdenoidsActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1980
- A radiological study of the adenoid in normal childrenClinical Otolaryngology, 1979
- Radiographic evaluation of adenoidal size in children: adenoidal-nasopharyngeal ratioAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1979
- Adenoidectomy: an evaluation of the indications.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1978
- The assessment of adenoidal size by radiological meansClinical Otolaryngology, 1978
- The Sleep Apnea SyndromesAnnual Review of Medicine, 1976